Niro LX with Tech package - Kia Niro Forum
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 7 (permalink) Old 06-02-2018, 01:52 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 28
Red face Niro LX with Tech package

Just got my new Metal Stream LX with the Advanced Tech Package yesterday. I'm coming from a beast of a 2004 Mercury Sable that got less than 20 mpg in the city.
As expected, I'm trying to figure out all the features.
I'm reading as much as I can here, before I ask a question that has been answered 10 times already.
The first thing that comes to mind is "Does the LX accept MIFI?" Aside from a quick yes or no, don't reply if it's listed elsewhere. I'll find it.
TLH1310 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 7 (permalink) Old 06-03-2018, 01:31 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 84
Welcome to the forum and congrats on the new Niro! That's certainly a big upgrade in tech from your 2004 Sable.
Kleen is offline  
post #3 of 7 (permalink) Old 06-04-2018, 03:18 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 289
Glad to have another owner on the forum.

What other vehicles were you looking into before deciding to get the Niro?
Alex is offline  
post #4 of 7 (permalink) Old 06-04-2018, 07:18 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 28
Thanks for the welcome.

Yes there is a BIG difference between my Sable where "Climate Control" was the wildest tech.

I was looking for specific dimensions not so much for a certain car: A wagon, low enough that my Mom can get into, (hip and knee replacements make it difficult to get into my brother's CRV) "Better gas mileage than the Sable, and the option to carry my toys on the roof (kayak, bike, etc). I was pretty much down to the Niro and the Hyundai Kona, it's "twin." The Gas mileage and the placement of the computer display (it sticks out on the Kona) were some outstanding features. I don't like the back end of a Prius where the angle "wastes" the last few feet of roof space with the back window.
TLH1310 is offline  
post #5 of 7 (permalink) Old 06-04-2018, 09:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 1,939
That Prius/Tesla/Ioniq angle "waste" is a large part of the reason they get such good gas mileage: Aerodynamics! Lots of modern sedans have a very similar shape because it is just so efficient.

The Kona has virtually identical dimensions to the Niro - a few inches shorter. But it will be a while before the hybrid is available so it is not really an option right now if you are looking for an efficient car.

2018 Kia LX HEV Metal Stream with Advanced Tech
yticolev is online now  
post #6 of 7 (permalink) Old 06-05-2018, 10:41 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 109
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLH1310 View Post
Thanks for the welcome.

Yes there is a BIG difference between my Sable where "Climate Control" was the wildest tech.

I was looking for specific dimensions not so much for a certain car: A wagon, low enough that my Mom can get into, (hip and knee replacements make it difficult to get into my brother's CRV) "Better gas mileage than the Sable, and the option to carry my toys on the roof (kayak, bike, etc). I was pretty much down to the Niro and the Hyundai Kona, it's "twin." The Gas mileage and the placement of the computer display (it sticks out on the Kona) were some outstanding features. I don't like the back end of a Prius where the angle "wastes" the last few feet of roof space with the back window.
The Niro's "twin" is the Ioniq, the Kona and Niro are completely unrelated. The Kona will likely never have a hybrid version. Niro and Ioniq share their platform and powertrain, even though the Ioniq is shaped much more like the Prius.

The flat angle of the Ioniq and Prius adds to fuel economy, it's a more slippery shape, but as you noticed, it's a less useful shape to the cargo area. The Niro squares that shape off, but the cost of that is about 5 MPG. I'm actually glad Hyundai and Kia did things this way, because you can directly compare the aerodynamics versus the useful squared-off cargo area. 5 MPG isn't all that significant to my mind.
npaladin2000 is offline  
post #7 of 7 (permalink) Old 06-05-2018, 11:19 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 1,939
I needed the Niro for the particular shape of the interior, but on paper, the Ioniq actually has more capacity. I happen to really like the way the Ioniq looks, and if I didn't need to put bicycles in upright, I never would have considered the Niro. The efficiency difference is best case actually more like 15%, which I think is pretty significant, especially at higher speeds.

You are right about the Kona, not planned for a hybrid version. A Kona EV will be released later this year, but won't hit NA until 2019.

2018 Kia LX HEV Metal Stream with Advanced Tech
yticolev is online now  
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tech Package - autonomous braking system FAILED! Dan Kia Niro General Discussion 52 06-13-2018 09:27 PM
EV with tech package or Touring? mrburnns 2018+ Kia Niro EV General Discussion 6 04-08-2018 09:36 PM
Kia Niro Overview (U.S. Spec) Administrator 2017+ Kia Niro News 6 08-12-2017 07:32 PM
Test Drove Niro and Ioniq Today Jay Kia Niro Versus the Competition 8 03-22-2017 12:41 AM
Kia Niro Press Release, Official Dr.T Kia Niro General Discussion 13 04-12-2016 01:05 PM

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome